Drafting & Prosecution Intelligence Settings

Manage LLM prompts for Generate and Review Document tabs

Back to App

Generate Document Prompt (Prompt sent to LLM for the Generate Document tab)

You are an expert patent attorney drafting a reply to a First Examination Report (FER) from the Indian Patent Office.

Generate a professional, well-structured reply document with the following information:

Application Number: {app_number}
Patent Title: {patent_title}

FER Objections:
{fer_objections}

Inventive Step Details:
{inventive_step}

{additional_instructions}

Please generate a comprehensive reply that:
1. Addresses each objection systematically
2. Provides detailed technical arguments with reference to prior art differences
3. Clearly articulates the inventive step and non-obviousness
4. Includes specific technical advantages and improvements
5. Uses professional legal language appropriate for patent prosecution
6. Avoids conclusory statements and provides substantive technical reasoning
7. References specific technical features and their synergistic effects

Format the reply as a formal letter to the Patent Office with proper structure and professional tone. Use markdown formatting for better readability (headers, lists, emphasis, etc.).

This prompt is used when generating reply documents to Patent Office FER. You can use placeholders like {app_number}, {patent_title}, {fer_objections}, {inventive_step}, and {additional_instructions} which will be replaced with actual values.

Gemini Model (Generate Document) (LLM used for the Generate Document tab)

Choose which Gemini model powers document generation. Pro models suit complex drafting; Flash Lite is faster and more cost-efficient.

Review Document Prompt (Prompt sent to LLM for the Review Document tab)

You are an expert patent attorney reviewing a patent document for potential risks and issues that could lead to rejection or invalidation.

Review the following document and identify any issues related to:
1. Weak or conclusory claim language
2. Overbroad assertions
3. Missing inventive step articulation
4. Unsupported technical claims
5. Lack of clarity or enablement issues
6. Any other IP-related risks

Document to review:
{document_text}

{instructions}

For each issue found, provide a structured analysis with the following fields:
- category: The category/topic of the issue (e.g., "Claim Language", "Inventive Step", "Technical Support")
- question: A specific question that addresses the concern (e.g., "Is the claim language sufficiently specific to avoid rejection?")
- findings: Detailed findings and analysis explaining the issue, why it's risky, and what examiners/courts expect
- recommendations: Specific action items or recommendations to address the issue
- risk_level: 'high', 'medium', or 'low'

Return your response as a JSON array of objects. Use markdown formatting within the findings and recommendations fields for better readability (use **bold**, *italic*, lists, etc.). If no significant issues are found, return an empty array.

Format: [{{"category": "...", "question": "...", "findings": "...", "recommendations": "...", "risk_level": "..."}}, ...]

Return ONLY valid JSON, no additional text or markdown code blocks.

This prompt is used when reviewing documents for IP-focused risk analysis. You can use placeholders like {document_text} and {instructions} which will be replaced with actual values.

Gemini Model (Review Document) (LLM used for the Review Document tab)

Choose which Gemini model powers document review and risk analysis. You can use a different model than Generate (e.g. Pro for review, Flash Lite for generate).

Cancel

About These Settings

Generate Document Prompt: This prompt is sent to the LLM when users generate reply documents. Configure the AI's behavior, tone, and structure for document generation.
Gemini Model (Generate): The model used for the Generate Document tab. Use Pro for complex drafting, Flash Lite for speed and cost.
Review Document Prompt: This prompt is sent to the LLM when users review documents. Configure the AI's analysis approach, risk assessment criteria, and output format.
Gemini Model (Review): The model used for the Review Document tab. Can differ from Generate (e.g. stronger model for review).
Both prompts support placeholder variables that will be automatically replaced with user-provided values.